Ron The Cop

A lie told often enough becomes the truth.

March 27th, 2010

Name Change – Friends of Mark Fuhrman is now Ron The Cop

Friends of Mark Fuhrman is now Ron The Cop

I’ve been considering retiring the name Friends of Mark Fuhrman for some time.  I chose this name when the Mark Fuhrman Radio Show was abruptly ended at KGA1510 AM Spokane, WA.  This blog was created to continue reporting those stories that Mark aired that were not being covered by the Spokesman-Review.  I believe the Cowles Co. may have been involved in why his show was canceled in much the way KXLY TV Report Tom Grant was silenced.  You can read more here.

 

While I greatly respect Mark Fuhrman there are those that can’t let go of the OJ Case.  I have a story to be told that the citizens of Spokane must know and Fuhrman’s name is sometimes an impediment to others hearing the story.  The story is how the citizens of Spokane were swindled out of $87 million and the murder of Jo Ellen Savage in the River Park Square Garage.

 

I will keep the domain name FOF.  The new name is linked to the old URL.  All the old links to documents stored here will remain active.

 

Ron The Cop

February 15th, 2010

Gavin Cooley CFO Spokane, WA – Misuse of CPA complaint filed

SCROLL FOR UPDATES

I will continue to post updates at they occur.

NOTE: Sorry because of the nature of cut/paste there may be some formatting errors that I will get around to fixing later.  So bare with me.


NOTE TO DENIZENS OF CITY HELL:

From my time as a criminal investigator and as the president of a 350 member police union I know my way around City Hall and the potential for “slush funds.”  There were several times I was not happy with what I had to do.  I’m sure there are others in “City Hell” that have kept “crib notes/files” for things that they were compelled to do that they kept for the event that the ball rolled down the hill to them to be chastised or scapegoated.

I do not have to work in this environment.  The Cowles Company can’t control me by their usual means.  If there are those who wish to pass along info/docs that are being withheld from the public, I am ready and willing to meet with them.  I will treat them as law enforcement confidential citizens informants.  I will not divulge their identities to anyone unless I’m called before a court to testify.  I will only then may do so “in camera” in a court that I believe to be free of this organized crime corruption.  I’m preparing with Sheriff Bamonte to bring a federal class action civil RICO prosecution on behalf of the citizens of Spokane to recover what was stolen from them by this criminal enterprise. I’m sure also if there is a subsequent disciplinary action if you sought competent legal counsel you could retire comfortably on the taxpayers nickel.  I will testify in your defense.

BREAKING – Complaint filed with WA State Board of Accountancy alleging Gavin Cooley the CFO of the City of Spokane, WA, violated RCW 18.04.345 regarding the misuse of Certified Public Accountant (CPA) after his name on the City’s webpage.

This is a continuation of a discussion thread at the Spokesman-Review article:

Verner says ‘plans in place’ to deal with 2011 deficit

*****

Here’s the cover letter I sent to the WA State Board of Accountancy with my complaint:

ORIGINAL SENT BY

CERTIFIED US MAIL

 

February 8, 2010

Washington State Board of Accountancy

711 South Capitol Way Suite 400

Olympia, WA, 98501

 

Re: Complaint re Gavin Cooley, CFO of the City of Spokane  – violation of RCW 18.04.345

Dear Sirs and Madams:

Please see my attached complaint alleging Gavin Cooley knowingly is in violation of RCW 18.04.345 – the misuse of the wording “CPA” after his name.  This may initially seem a trivial complaint worthy of perhaps a “warning letter” to correct this offense. When viewed with the information I am supplying you, this is a very serious offense, that you must take seriously and compel a complete and thorough criminal investigation.  Cooley’s alleged violation came to my attention during my investigation to bring a civil class action RICO prosecution against all those complicit in the RPS Bond Fraud et al that will ultimately cost the citizens of Spokane upwards of $100 million dollars.  Mr. Cooley is a principal in my RICO case. 

As I conclude in my complaint:

. . . I believe there is strong probable cause to believe that Gavin Cooley knowingly violated RCW 18.04.345.  Cooley by allowing his CPA license to expire is no longer constrained by the professional ethics of CPAs and subject to regulation under state and federal law. Cooley either knowingly or tacitly allowed the letters “CPA” to appear after his name on the City of Spokane Treasury Department’s webpage.  The effect of which misleads bond agents, bond investors, and bond raters alike.  Cooley by his actions aided and abetted a criminal enterprise as defined in the Federal RICO Act to commit a municipal bond fraud.  Cooley in his deference to this criminal enterprise allows it to continue. This criminal enterprise will likely commit further frauds that will yet again victimize the citizens of Spokane if it is not destroyed.

I would further call your attention to today’s edition of the Spokesman-Review article:

Council seeks more assistance

Pay cuts for other positions would fund extra hours for members’ part-time support staff

 

Not only has Mr. Cooley allowed his CPA license to expire, the City of Spokane has left the City’s Auditor position vacant.  The Auditor is required to have the equivalent of a CPA however the City’s CFO position has no such requirement.  This effectively leaves Mr. Cooley in control of the City’s some $500 million dollars without external and independent auditing controls.

 

I would caution that you not seek the assistance of the Spokane County Prosecutor’s Office, as it is complicit in the cover up of the manslaughter death of Jo Savage in the RPS Parking Garage.  I realize your criminal cases are forwarded to the WA Attorney General’s Office for filing and prosecution.  I would also advise caution in seeking legal advice of the WA Attorney General’s Office as their actions in the review of the Savage murder case were less than professional and in fact gave political support to County Prosecutor Steve Tucker in his decision not to file this case.

 

I have not yet filed a PDR for the relevant emails as described in by complaint with the City of Spokane City Clerk’s Office’s to allow you time to act.  I would caution I have several reliable sources that have told me in the past that certain City records including emails have been “scrubbed” to purge incriminating information.  I have taken certain steps to preserve these emails if they still do exist.

 

I would also request that Board Member Ed Jolicoeur recuse himself from any actions involving my complaint.  Mr. Jolicoeur is a close associate of Mr. Cooley and serves on the City of Spokane’s Audit Committee.  If there are any other Board Members with associations with Mr. Cooley or the Cowles Co et al, I would request that they recuse themselves too.

 

I will be happy to share any information and expertise I might have with your investigators.

 

In conclusion in my 35-year career as a criminal investigator, this is certainly one of the most blatantly criminal enterprises I have ever encountered. It’s hard to find words to adequately describe it.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

Det. Ron Wright (Retired)

Professional Vitae

*****

Your can read related material here:

WA Board of Accountancy Complaint

Affiant’s Declaration

Table of Exhibits

City of Spokane PDR request

S & P email (Email to analyst that did the latest S & P bond rating report on Spokane)

*****
Here’s a related discussion thread at the Spokesman-Review regarding Mayor Verner’s State of the City address where she discusses the looming $10M budget deficit that is directly related to the RPS Bailout AKA the RPS Settlement Agreement

  • BigE on February 12 at 11:06 a.m.

    Does anyone else have a problem with Mayor Verner ?
    I understand the past problems with city government but for goodness sake, can we get someone that has some bite to them them. She looks and acts like a she is vanilla pudding, plain, bland, get it anywhere, all taste the same.
    What are we getting from our Mayor, she admits she is a “behind the scenes type person”, in my opinion a true leader is out front, setting the example, trying to motivate people to improve our community, start thinking as a whole rather than a bunch of individuals.

  • Flag as inappropriate

  •  

    Ron_the_Cop on February 12 at 12:15 p.m.

  • BigE,

  • You and me both. Here’s my most recent complaint related leaving the City’s auditor position vacant and using salary savings of this position to fund the additional staff time for the Council assistants. Mind you they were just made permanent part time with benefits that no other part time staff in the City get.

  •  

  • This all has to do with the upcoming budget deficit. Perhaps they will dip into the “Bank of Hine” to bail them out. AKA Solid Waste Reserve Fund of $49M that is held off budget.

    See my comment here re Mr. Brunt’s previous story on the Auditor position et al:

    http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2010…

    Here’s another story that the S-R has as of yet to cover. My sources say there is a betting pool under way in “City Hell” AKA City Hall whether the S-R will devote any ink to this:-)

    See my other comment:

    http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2010…

    READ QUICKLY AS THIS IS LIKELY TO DISAPPEAR

    Dear Mr. Adams,

    You are quite correct re a complaint was filed by me with the WA State Board of Accountancy. This complaint alleges a violation of violation of RCW 18.04.345 by re Gavin Cooley, CFO of the City of Spokane – misuse of the letters “CPA” after his name on the City’s website. The cat’s now out of the bag as this web page has since been “scrubbed.”

    I understand this blog thread is generating considerable interest with City Hall insiders watching from the bleachers. While Mr. Brunt may write a follow-up story, in the interest of full disclosure you can read my complaint below with supporting documents and screen prints and decide whether this was a mere oversight or something more:

    Cover letter
    http://friendsofmarkfuhrman.org/blog/…

    Complaint
    http://friendsofmarkfuhrman.org/blog/…

    Affiant’s Declaration
    http://friendsofmarkfuhrman.org/blog/…

    Table of Exhibits
    http://friendsofmarkfuhrman.org/blog/…

    [New note in the other post]
    City of Spokane PDR Request for Docs
    http://friendsofmarkfuhrman.org/blog/…

    Det. Ron Wright (Retired)
    AKA Ron the Cop

    Flag as inappropriate

  •  

    BigE on February 12 at 1:25 p.m.

    Way to go Ron the Cop,

    Our elected officials are just that, we the people are sick and tired of being lied to, double standards, riding the fence on issues.

    Bunch of overly senstive people, no values, no morals, trying their best to find a shread of happiness in this crazy world.

    That my friends is the demise of our society, no backbone, easily offended, affraid of hard work, the attention span of a radish, Grandpa is not happy.

    Flag as inappropriate

  •  

    spokanesausage on February 12 at 2:56 p.m.

    I’m hard pressed to point to anything she has accomplished or where her leadership is taking Spokane.

    She’s also sending mixed messages of working with the County, then seperating out a court system that was already integrated.

    And what of these Green Jobs she promised……

    Flag as inappropriate

  •  

    Ron_the_Cop on February 12 at 3:04 p.m.

    Award winning investigator reporter Larry Shook has replied to my comments about Mayor’s Verner’s State of the City address (See below). Also readers may be interested in this related email I sent to the S & P’s principal researcher on their latest bond report:

    http://friendsofmarkfuhrman.org/blog/…

    Det. Ron Wright (Retired)

    *****

    Detective Wright: Former Councilwoman Cherie Rodgers has been forecasting this deficit for five years as a direct result of the RPS securities fraud and its fraudulent settlement. Anyone investigating the true cost of the RPS fraud to Spokane’s citizens would benefit from seeking Mrs. Rodgers’s analysis. Similarly, sincere investigators would benefit from interviewing Gary Ceriani and O.Yale Lewis, both of whom have special expertise in this matter because of their service to the city as RPS special counsel. If Mayor Verner is sincere about persuading Spokane’s citizens that she is ethically and honestly managing Spokane’s fiscal crisis, waiving privilege and allowing Mr. Ceriani and Mr. Lewis to speak openly and frankly about their knowledge of the RPS fraud is one of the most effective steps she could take. Among other things, it would constitute a bold statement that she and Spokane’s elected leaders have nothing to hide.

    Mr. Ceriani told me that he had advised against settling the RPS securities fraud case. (Please see “A New RPS Fraud?” at www.camasmagazine.com). He advocated seeking full recovery of the $26 million RPS parking garage bond fraud from the RPS developer. That, indeed, is what the city council advised the citizens of Spokane they would do in purchasing Mr. Ceriani’s original bond fraud case for $45 million. Mr. Ceriani told me that he was “personally offended” by the fraudulent conduct of RPS developer Betsy Cowles. He wanted a jury to force her to disgorge her fraudulent proceeds from the RPS fiasco. His perspective is strikingly similar to that of former Councilwoman Rodgers. When former Mayor John Powers enlisted the help of retired Washington Supreme Court Chief Justice Richard Guy to persuade the city council to mediate the RPS fraud, Mrs. Rodgers refused. She presented Judge Guy with evidence of securities fraud. “How do you mediate fraud?” she asked him. He had no answer. (Please see “Judge Guy Meets Cherie Rodgers” at www.camasmagazine.com.)

    During his tenure as RPS special counsel, Mr. Lewis immediately found evidence that public officials had entered into a conspiracy with the developer to defraud bond purchasers and Spokane’s citizens. At this point, the evidence of Mr. Lewis’s preliminary findings is simply overwhelming. I believe that evidence supports the charges made by both you and former Sheriff Tony Bamonte that Spokane is the victim of continuing organized crime, with the Cowles family as the hub. (I believe the evidence also supports the charge of you and Sheriff Bamonte that this public corruption led directly to Jo Ellen Savage’s death in the RPS parking garage and continues to threaten other such tragedies.) This very evidence is why Mr. Lewis advocated taking the long-hidden truth of the RPS fraud back to the state supreme court so that the evidence could be adjudicated openly before the public. Neither Mayor Verner nor any of the other RPS fraud perpetrators ever wanted that to happen. And so Spokane remains trapped in its own private Groundhog Day of denial, avoidance and deception. This is clearly disastrous to the city’s fiscal health. It is also profoundly injurious, I believe, to its psychological health.

    Larry Shook

    Flag as inappropriate

  •  

    Ron_the_Cop on February 12 at 3:05 p.m.

    I too believe a good move by Mayor Verner would be to relieve both O. Yale Lewis and Gary Ceriani of their atty/client privilege so they can speak openly to the citizens of Spokane as ultimately they were their clients and paid their bill.

    The City in as much as waived Lewis’ privilege in releasing his documents that I filed a PDR for:

    http://friendsofmarkfuhrman.org/blog/…

    See also my case summary for a civil RICO prosecution:
    http://friendsofmarkfuhrman.org/blog/…

    Det. Ron Wright (Retired)

    Flag as inappropriate

  •  

    dick adams on February 12 at 4:05 p.m.

    The story regarding her blah, blah, state of the city, was VAGUE. How can it be anything else. Clandestine meetings continue, reckless spending habits continue, poor OTTO, the firefighter who shacked up in a fire station WITH A 16 YEAR OLD GIRL, has been forgotten, and he was allowed to commit the same crime in California BECAUSE nothing was done about it, thanks to Verner. I again was reminded when I received by real estate taxes a few days ago, the taxpayers who do not have tax exemptions are paying dearly for Verner et al, agreement to shaft the taxpayers for the next 30 years to pay off a huge debt to the River Park Square robbery, AND VERNER CONTINUES TO HAND OUT TAX EXEMPTIONS TO OWNERS OF MILLION DOLLAR CONDOS. Crime in Spokane continues to be above the national average in every category of crime, and the news almost daily is horrific with stabbings, fights, home invasion, and car thefts in the Lilac City. Spokane is named as one of the worst places in the country to have your car stolen. The down core allows double bottom trucks to travel on every street and avenue, trucks with loads of gravel spilling all over the place, and the law to be covered up is not enforced along with side-walk parking and NO TRUCK ROUTES. The SPD obviously has a alcohol problem with many alcoholics and nothing is done until one of Spokane`s finest gets into a accident, and yet VERNER is painting a rosy picture which the writer of the story says is VAGUE. MAYOR VERNER LACKS THE LEADERSHIP NEEDED TO RUN A CITY THE SIZE OF SPOKANE and HER PROMISES MEAN NOTHING. AND LAST BUT NOT LEAST, WE CONTINUE TO BE THE BUTT OF JOKES FOR TALK SHOWS AS THE CITY CONTINUES TO OFFER FODDER.

    Flag as inappropriate

  •  

    dick adams on February 12 at 6:37 p.m.

    ADDENDUM:
    VERNER, CONTINUES TO LOOK THE OTHER WAY REGARDING THE POTENTIAL DEATH TRAP IN THE RIVER PARK SQUARE PARKING GARAGE. IT APPEARS TO ME, VERNER SIDES WITH THE DEVELOPERS OF THE GARAGE BY NOT DEMANDING A CRITICAL INVESTIGATION RE SAFETY OF THE CITIZENS WHO CONTINUE TO PARK THERE. WHEN, AND ITS ONLY A QUESTION OF TIME, IT HAPPENS AGAIN, SHE WILL AGAIN ENTER HER CAVE CLOSING HER EYES, EARS AND MOUTH AND DO NOTHING. SAD. MAY MS. JO SAVAGE, WHO MAY HAVE BEEN MURDERED, REST IN PEACE.

    Flag as inappropriate

  •  

    Verbal on February 12 at 7:16 p.m.

    Mr. Adams – I agree with you on Mayor Verner’s lack of leadership skills, but I must question your line about “Spokane is named as one of the worst places in the country to have your car stolen.”

    Last year, the National Insurance Crime Bureau ranked Yakima at #3, but I don’t believe Spokane was on the list. Is there another ranking out there?

    Flag as inappropriate

  •  

    Ron_the_Cop on February 12 at 8:13 p.m.

    Verbal,

    The answer to your question re auto thefts – Yakima, Seattle and Spokane are in the top 25 in the nation:

    http://blog.seattlepi.com/consumersma…

    I don’t understand why we don’t have LoJack in the Spokane Region. Most cops I’ve talked to don’t know what this is.

    See LoJack home page at:

    http://www.lojack.com/

    Flag as inappropriate

  •  

    Ron_the_Cop on February 12 at 8:23 p.m.

    Mr. Cooley responded of which I was a recipient to an earlier email. I’m assuming this was in reply to Mr. Shook’s email copied above. I thought I would share his response:

    “I hate wasting time responding to silly emails but not responding to these rants sends the wrong message.

    In 2006 I decided to lapse my CPA certification. The certification is not a job requirement and my busy schedule made it difficult for me to meet the 120 hour continuing professional education requirement (Note: I passed all sections of the CPA Exam on my first try and learned a tremendous amount during my years in public accounting). I therefore alerted my staff I was no longer a CPA and removed the designation from my business cards, letterhead and other areas where it was used. Since then I have never used the CPA designation. Also, whenever I knew I was listed as a CPA by someone else, I immediately corrected the situation. Simple.

    That is my response. The many other wild accusations in these endless strings of conspiracy-based emails speak for themselves.

    Gavin Cooley
    City of Spokane
    Chief Financial Officer

    ****
    Mr. Shook sent this reply back:

    “Dear Gavin:

    Thank you for including me in this response. I have no idea if the lapse of your CPA license is significant. Retired economic crimes Det. Ron Wright obviously finds it suspicious, given the broad pattern of substantially documented intentional deception concerning the RPS fraud. In 35 years of investigating, and contributing to the incarceration of, white collar criminals, Det. Wright obviously developed some instincts about dealing with the criminal mind. Has he found evidence here that the lapse of, and apparently published misrepresentation of, your CPA license is part of the pattern of criminal activity he alleges in Spokane? It’s for him, not me, to explain the basis of his concern.

    In your note below, you dismiss his concern as part of “many other wild accusations in these endless strings of conspiracy-based emails [that] speak for themselves. You then include my email below that. To wit:”

    [See above]

    “If you mean to include assertions contained in my message in your reference to “many other wild accusations in these endless strings of conspiracy-based emails [that] speak for themselves,” please tell me. Please be specific about which of my assertions you consider unfounded. I will provide you and all other recipients of this email with the evidence supporting my assertions. I will welcome your response to this evidence. Thank you.

    Larry Shook”

    Flag as inappropriate

  •  

    undooly_prosecuted on February 12 at 10:15 p.m.

    How much will the deficit be after Spokane has to pay the Zehm family and pay to hide the rest of the PD’s and prosecutors blunders? House cleaning from the top to the bottom might be in order………..

    Flag as inappropriate

  •  

    Ron_the_Cop on February 12 at 11:16 p.m.

    Unduly prosecuted,

    This case is probably worth a few million as a wrongful death. Might add a little to the deficit but the City has a reinsurer I think which will probably kick in around $1M. Good thought but the City’s premium will probably go up though:-)

    The Spokesman Removes Postings – LOL. So you’ve noticed too. Your head should be spinning. You were robbed of cool $45M in this heist.

    Flag as inappropriate

  •  

    Daisy Minken on February 13 at 2:14 a.m.

    Mary Verner has simply mouthed the teachings of this disaster of a President. She has no leadership and has done nothing. She makes people smile. If the people knew what she’s been up to, she’d be gone in a split second. Never will be discovered because she’s never identified with anything that might spark notice of investigation. If anything goes wrong, she immediately blames a minion, covers it up or distances herself.

    Not one bit of fiscal respnsibility. She’ll continue to worry about her appearances. Not one street has been fixed. The Police are spending $4.5 million on new offices on Gardner and she just smiles. Nobody will ever asked why they get new offices and spend so much in a very depressed economy in Spokane. Not even knowing the debt is well above the $7 million advertised. It’s all hidden in private conferences despite her promise of openness.

    Flag as inappropriate

  •  

    Ron_the_Cop on February 13 at 12:58 p.m.

    More from Dick Adams a retired senior executive with USS Steel and knows his way around financial and bond related maters had this to say re Mr. Cooley’s comment above:

    RE, Gavin Cooley`s note, saying,”I hate wasting time responding to silly emails but not responding to these rants sends the wrong message”. etc

    Earlier this week I met with my “CPA” tax man, and before we started to find out how much I owed Uncle Sam, I was curious about who would use his name, and showing CPA after it as a title. My tax man was an excellent source to better understand what the CPA title meant. He explained how, where and when a person could use CPA after ones name. When he was done explaining and answering my questions he inquired who I was talking about and he asked for his name. When he found out I was talking about Gavin Cooley, the CFO for the city of Spokane, he was appalled. He asked me the correct spelling for Cooley and wrote his name down. My CPA tax preparer asked if something was going to be done about Cooley, using CPA after his name, which really irritated him, and he replied, something should be done. I answered him that a well respected former detective with 35 years of service and now retired planned too.

    Enclosed herewith, is the document showing Gavin Cooley, CPA, for a bragging event this week scheduled at the Spokane City club. It does not require reading the story about Cooley, but merely shows the document to click on and says it all.

    With what I found out this week, I`m wondering if the “silly emails” and “these rants” were what COOLEY was referring to re his email?

    Dick Adams

    Mr. Adams had asked me to provide the supporting documents and link to them in his email to others:

    It’s stored on my server here:

    http://friendsofmarkfuhrman.org/blog/…

    If you’re interested in the scrubbed webpage here’s the screen print from earlier this week:

    http://friendsofmarkfuhrman.org/blog/…

    Flag as inappropriate

  •  

    Ron_the_Cop on February 13 at 1:13 p.m.

    Former Sheriff Bamonte of Breaking Blue fame:

    http://www.spokesmanreview.com/intera…

    asked these questions:

    February 13, 2010

    Dear Mr. Cooley:

    I was perplexed to receive your e-mail concerning your CPA certification and don’t know your reason for sending it to me, since I don’t know you, have never met you, nor have ever corresponded with you in any manner. However, since you took the time to explain to me the reason you let your CPA certification expire, I will, as a courtesy, give you my thoughts. Incidentally, congratulations on passing all sections of the CPA exam on your first try. My wife was also a CPA (she let her certification lapse when she left the field) and also passed all sections of the CPA exam on her first try. I am proud of her for that achievement, as you are also proud for your achievement.

    Since you brought this to my attention, and as a Spokane resident and taxpayer, I will give you my thoughts: Because you are currently working in the field of the city’s accounting and financial affairs, I think it would have been in the best interest of both the city and yourself to have maintained your CPA certification. The fact that you worked hard to get it in the first place and the prestige of the designation are both important, but most importantly, I feel the education level that designation requires you to maintain is important and in the taxpayer’s best interest. My brother-in-law, William Schaeffer, is also a CPA and the CFO of California Institute of the Arts (CalArts) in Santa Clarita, California. We get together often and I assure you he appreciates the knowledge he receives from the continuing professional education requirements necessary to maintain his CPA license. Both he and my wife, as CPAs, have taken many hours of professional education requirements, and both feel it is important to maintain the high level of education these courses offer. I have also found that, during the various professional careers I have been involved in, the educational requirements have been in the best interest of myself and those I have served. This is just my opinion, but I hope it helps. Please feel free to share this letter with your superiors in hopes they may allow you to take the time from your “busy schedule” to allow you to stay current with the laws and changes that affect your position.

    Mr. Cooley, I also appreciate your willingness to freely impart your information to someone you don’t know. With your openness in mind, I have one question I would like you to respond to in your capacity as Spokane’s chief financial officer. I am enclosing an attachment with copy of a letter I wrote to Spokane County Auditor Ralph Baker (E-110) and also an attachment I provided Mr. Baker with my letter to him (E-96). Mr. Baker did not respond to that letter, but hopefully you will.

    At this time I respectfully ask the same question of you I asked Mr. Baker: When both the sellers (Cowleses) and the purchasers (Spokane City Council members) were in complete agreement that the value of the RPS parking garage was $26 million and both the sellers and the buyers had it officially appraised by a Washington State licensed appraiser, of which they were both in agreement, why isn’t the RPS garage currently assessed at the $26 million value rather than the current assessed value of $10,628,800? I feel this is an important question in light of the city’s current financial shortcomings. To me, it appears that when the city originally purchased the RPS garage from the Cowleses there was a fraud committed, but if not, the Cowles are currently being given an illegal tax break of almost $16 million dollars on their taxable base. Also, if you are not familiar with the June 28, 2004, IRS (Department of the Treasury) report, I ask that you look it up and read it.

    Thank you in advance for your time and attention. I look forward to your response.

    Sincerely,

    Tony Bamonte

    Flag as inappropriate

  •  

    Ron_the_Cop on February 13 at 1:17 p.m.

    Mr. Graham and Mr. Brunt,

    I haven’t seen any coverage this breaking story in the S-R. Why? We have on the record statements by a number of people. Seems to me the S-R has a duty and responsibility to ask these probative questions of our City elected/appointed. Why must Spokane citizens have to ask these probative questions?

    Seems to me this is now newsworthy. Perhaps the S-R has something to hide?

    [Note to Mr. Pitts thank you for allowing this important thread to stand which has not been the practice of the S-R in the past]

    Flag as inappropriate

  •  

    Verbal on February 13 at 7:26 p.m.

    Ron,
    With all due respect, please stop spamming. If we are interested in your story, we’d have clicked on your original link and then followed from your website. Repeatedly bringing up Mr. Cooley on a story about Mayor Verner (and other stories and websites) as you are doing smacks of desperate pleas for attention rather than thoughtful fact finding and presentation.

    Flag as inappropriate

  •  

    Ron_the_Cop on February 13 at 10:38 p.m.

    Verbal,

    I’m very sorry if I annoyed you and others here. I only seek the truth. This venue serves as the new public square to speak directly to the citizens of Spokane. The S-R reporters won’t or can’t report these stories. This has everything to do with the $10M deficit the Mayor Verner spoke about in her address.

    This is a structural deficit that was the result of the RPS Bail Out and the RPS Settlement Agreement. Mr. Cooley was one of the principal architects of this agreement as was Attorney Laurel Siddoway and Steve Reynolds the secretary treasurer of the Cowles Co.

    So far the S-R has failed to seek the truth and is covering for the criminal activities of its owners. If the citizens of Spokane are not informed of the truth, they cannot hold their elected/appointed governmental officials accountable for their criminal actions. There has already been one murder that was the direct result of the actions of those involved in carrying out these frauds. I’m trying to prevent any more from occurring.

    Trust me I know of what I speak. Read my professional vitae if you have any doubts:

    http://friendsofmarkfuhrman.org/blog/…

    Det. Ron Wright (Retired)

    Flag as inappropriate

  •  

    Ron_the_Cop on February 13 at 10:45 p.m.

    correction

    Steve Reynolds = Steve Rector

    Flag as inappropriate

  •  

    Ron_the_Cop on February 14 at 5:22 p.m.

    Verbal,

    I may just take you up on your suggestion and just link new developments over at my server. And there has been some real barn burner emails. It’s getting a little cumbersome to keep updating here. That’s assuming Mr. Pitts (S-R online editor) is not overruled by the “powers that be” come Tuesday and this thread still stands as a public record.

    Here’s another little tidbit from Tim Connor re Mr. Cooley’s email above apparently calling Connor/Shook reporting:

    “The many other wild accusations in these endless strings of conspiracy-based emails speak for themselves.”

    Here’s the excerpt by Connor:

    Regarding Moral Hazard
    Published on November 29, 2008

    http://cforjustice.org/2008/11/29/reg…

    “Now, that I don’t get. And, apparently, neither does Gavin’s boss. It was only a few months ago that the Mayor acknowledged the City’s remaining $40 million-plus indebtedness in the RPS fiasco (which, as advertised, wasn’t supposed to cost the city a penny) and said, according to the Spokesman-Review’s Jonathan Brunt: “The pay-down of the River Park Square facilities is far from over.””

    and

    “I’ve known Gavin for years. He’s very personable, witty, and surprisingly candid at times. Years ago, before he became CFO, he approached me as I was walking up the hill to City Hall from Peaceful Valley, where I’d parked my car. He told me that, in his circles, the view was that the only two people involved in “this” who sleep well at night were “you and Larry.” “This” was the River Park Square fiasco and Larry, of course, is Larry Shook, my reporting partner at the time on the RPS investigation. I’ve written a book about RPS, “Secret Deal,” and Larry and I co-authored a second book “Under the Influence, Spokane, the Cowles Family, and River Park Square.” Both books contain reporting that won national journalism awards and while Larry and I occasionally endure general, ad hominem comments questioning our sanity, no one has seriously contested the facts in either book.”

    Det. Ron Wright (Retired)

UPDATE I:

More email exchanges with Gavin Cooley:

Dear Larry,

Thank you for your email.

Responses to questions on the Riverpark Square matter are now coordinated through the City Attorney’s Office.  

There are, however, other areas from your prior emails I would be happy to discuss.

If you are available next week I would appreciate the opportunity to meet for coffee. I am available at xxx-xxxx.

Sincerely,

Gavin
Sent from iPhone

*****

Thanks, Gavin.

Please tell me specifically what you are wishing and willing to discuss. I repeat, if you believe there are errors in anything I have written in any context, please tell me specifically what they are so that I may correct them. If you believe I have committed errors that you are unable to address but the City Attorney’s Office is, please have that office contact me immediately with complete details. I request a written and complete record of any errors that you or the City Attorney’s Office believe I have made. I very much appreciate your assistance. For the purpose of holding myself accountable and assuming full responsibility for my work, I have copied this correspondence openly, as you see above. I have also blind copied it widely for the same purpose. You are obviously welcome to do the same.

Best wishes, Larry Shook

*****

Dear Larry,

My invitation was simply intended to provide you with a better understanding of the factors contributing to the City’s projected 2011 budget deficit (which, is proportionately smaller than most other cities across the country).

Unfortunately, our email exchanges begin to feel more like a lesson in ‘Catch 22’ so I respectfully withdraw.


Sincerely,

Gavin  
Sent from iPhone

*****

Dear Gavin:

Again, thank you. And again, I would welcome receiving from you any written explanation that you would offer to “provide me with a better understanding of the factors contributing to the City’s projected 2011 budget deficit,” as you write below.

As I understand the “Catch 22” you refer to below, the evidence suggests to me that it is one for which you bare at least partial responsibility. When you and Cowles treasurer Steve Rector recommended that the Spokane City Council settle the RPS securities fraud claim on the disastrous terms that you did, based on the developer’s threat of bankruptcy, I believe your professional credentials suggest you should have known that was an empty threat. Indeed, when the developer tried the identical threat in response to the suit former RPS manager Bob Robideaux brought against her, a federal bankruptcy court judge not only rejected the claim, she penalized the developer for making a bad faith filing. That penalty, I am told, approached $10 million. Yet you and other Spokane officials pretended the threat had merit, allowing the the multi-million cost of the RPS fraud to be passed onto Spokane’s taxpayers. If you deny this, a wall of evidence exposes the falsity of your denial. If you admit it, you acknowledge complicity in what both retired economic crimes Det. Ron Wright and retired Sheriff Tony Bamonte charge was organized crime that led directly to the death of Jo Ellen Savage in the RPS parking garage on April 8, 2006.

I agree with you. Based on the evidence, some of which the city paid the plaintiffs $45 million for in the RPS securities fraud case, I believe you and many others do face a Catch 22 of your own creation. I believe that at some level this must be a terrible burden for all of you to live with. I sympathize with you. My sympathies for the public are greater, though, including Ms. Savage’s friends and family. Greater still is my concern that Ms. Savage’s tragedy could be repeated at any time as a direct result of the Catch 22 you refer to.

Once again, Gavin, if you are in possession of facts that refute these conclusions, I request you provide me with them immediately.

Sincerely, Larry Shook

*****
Dear Mr. Cooley

I’m unclear just which email you were referring to in your email.  Was it Larry Shook’s or perhaps mine:

I hate wasting time responding to silly emails but not responding to these rants sends the wrong message.

In 2006 I decided to lapse my CPA certification.  The certification is not a job requirement and my busy schedule made it difficult for me to meet the 120 hour continuing professional education requirement (Note: I passed all sections of the CPA Exam on my first try and learned a tremendous amount during my years in public accounting).  I therefore alerted my staff I was no longer a CPA and removed the designation from my business cards, letterhead and other areas where it was used.  Since then I have never used the CPA designation.   Also, whenever I knew I was listed as a CPA by someone else, I immediately corrected the situation.  Simple.

That is my response.  The many other wild accusations in these endless strings of conspiracy-based emails speak for themselves.

Gavin Cooley

City of Spokane

Chief Financial Officer

Mr. Cooley, I’m just a shopworn, battle weary detective of 35-years from large Southern California city that chose to retire to Spokane for it many fine attributes.  While traveling back and forth to So Cal I began listening to the old Mark Furhman Radio Show on KGA.  Over time I heard people like former Sheriff Tony Bamonte, former Councilperson Cherie Rodgers, former Mayor John Powers, former KXLY TV Reporter Tom Grant, Tim Connors, Larry Shook, Dr. Kim Thorburn, Sheriff Ozzie Knezovich, Breean Beggs of the Center for Justice, former Mayor Dennis Hession, and the then Councilperson Mary Verner.

My awakening occurred when I heard US Attorney for the Eastern District Jim McDevitt on the show who came on to rebut what Larry Shook had alleged the previous week of his personal involvement in the RPS Bond Fraud with his former colleague Michael Ormsby at the law firme of Preston & Gates.   Once I heard the tension in McDevitt’s voice I immediately understood why no federal criminal investigation had ever got off the ground regarding the RPS Bond Fraud fiasco.  This was being covered up.  I found what these people were saying wasn’t being reported either in the Spokesman-Review.  Why?

Mr. Cooley, I’m sorry if my cynicism as an old gumshoe clouds my judgment.  First there was an interesting retiring of bonds on the Sports Arena necessary to secure new bonds for the expansion of the Convention Center.  Related to this we  have an unelected Public Facilities District Board that has taxing authority.  The much touted Kendall Yards Project fell flat on its face even though the City gave it very favorable TIFF funding without voter approval.  Not to mention the “bums rush”  the Regional Health Board who our Mayor led the charge, gave Dr. Kim Thorburn.  Dr. Thorburn was probably seen as impediment to this project by the players because of the location of the public health building.  Of course I’ve notice the unique urban redeveloped by arson that occurs in this town e.g., the District 81 Admin Building fire where Nordstroms now sits and the Jamison Building fire (AKA Zukor clothing store) where the STA Transit Plaza now sits.

I’m sure it has faded from the collective memories of most Spokanites but Spokane Fire Department Fire Capt. Hanna was killed fighting this fire at the Jamison Building.  This was an arson/murder that has no statute of limitations as the murder of Ms. Savage did.  The STA Transit Plaza was built at considerable public expense $20M and is now only appraised by the County Assessor’s Office at about 1/4 of this amount.  Sound familiar?

I tried to get the police and fire department reports on this murder case.  Since I teach forensics and crime scene investigation I thought there may be physical evidence that could be processed with new forensics techniques.  Much to my complete astonishment there were only fragmentary police reports, no fire department reports and no record of any physical evidence being retained.  Where I’m from no open murder cases especially involving on duty public safety employees simply disappear.  From the reports I’ve read this was no transient warming fire.  It was an arson set. There were significant leads regarding potential suspects that there are no supplementary reports indicating that these leads were ever followed up on.

Along the way we had the preventable death of Jo Savage in the RPS Parking Garage which was in my opinion is a First Degree Manslaughter.  Her death was the direct result of the actions/omissions of those complicit in these frauds.  What is distressing to me is our local law enforcement community all turned a blind eye to her death and did nothing.  There was no complete and thorough criminal investigation done that followed the evidence no matter where it would lead.  It’s not surprising that County Prosecutor Steve Tucker found “insufficient evidence” to file a criminal complaint.  This was because he didn’t compel such a criminal investigation to be done before he rendered his filing opinion.  More importantly we still don’t know if the RPS Parking Garage is safe for continued public occupancy because the Mayor and City Council will not ask the probative questions on behalf citizens of Spokane.

This was followed by ill-fated Northside Landfill Little League Project which was a political deal gone bad because the neighbors got wind of this play.  This action directed my attention to the Park Board and the great lease deal on the Northbank property that had all the earmarks of being RPS II.  Dare I mentioned the YMCA dilemma which the City had to dip into the “Bank of Hine” for a bridge loan?  Of course there was the AMR billing fraud?

Mr. Cooley were you referring to the collective works of Tim Connors and Larry Shook in your reference to, “these endless strings of conspiracy-based emails speak for themselves?”  This seems incongruous considering what you had to say about their reporting in the past.  See Connor’s article, “Regarding Moral Hazard.”  He said:

Now, that I don’t get. And, apparently, neither does Gavin’s boss. It was only a few months ago that the Mayor acknowledged the City’s remaining $40 million-plus indebtedness in the RPS fiasco (which, as advertised, wasn’t supposed to cost the city a penny) and said, according to the Spokesman-Review’s Jonathan Brunt: “The pay-down of the River Park Square facilities is far from over.”

and

I’ve known Gavin for years. He’s very personable, witty, and surprisingly candid at times. Years ago, before he became CFO, he approached me as I was walking up the hill to City Hall from Peaceful Valley, where I’d parked my car. He told me that, in his circles, the view was that the only two people involved in “this” who sleep well at night were “you and Larry.” “This” was the River Park Square fiasco and Larry, of course, is Larry Shook, my reporting partner at the time on the RPS investigation. I’ve written a book about RPS, “Secret Deal,” and Larry and I co-authored a second book “Under the Influence, Spokane, the Cowles Family, and River Park Square.” Both books contain reporting that won national journalism awards and while Larry and I occasionally endure general, ad hominem comments questioning our sanity, no one has seriously contested the facts in either book.

Sheriff Bamonte asked me to compile data regarding the actual damages that the citizens of Spokane suffered in the RPS Bond Fraud fiasco.  Dick Adams a former senior executive with USS Steel and very familiar with complex financial statements and corporate bonds ask me to go along to meet with Tim Dunivant.  Mr. Adams wanted to check on an insurance settlement from the Northside Landfill he had tracked earlier in the 1990s (See attached S-R articles).  I also have a personal interest in the Northside Landfill after the ill-fated Little League Project became an issue so I agreed to go along.

After Mr. Adams concluded his questions with Mr. Dunivant I briefly mentioned that I was doing some work on the RPS Bond fiasco.  I told him I had filed some PDRs but I was wondering if he might be able to answer some my questions later without having to file additional PDRS.  You were kind enough to oblige, “. . . just call us and we will handle your request from our office and you don`t have to bother and go through a public records request.”

This was the spirit I did email Mr. Dunivant.  Mr. Dunivant however had to refer me to Mr. Danek with my follow up questions. This is what precipitated the latest series of email with Mr. Danek.  It was after this I received information of the lapse of your CPA license.  Since you’re offering an explanation as to why you allowed your CPA license, I have several simple questions that might put to rest this latest furor.

I won’t cover here what former Sheriff Bamonte has written you about his surprise of your allowing your CPA license to expire.  I share his concerns.  Since you are an “at will” employee and could be dismissed at anytime wouldn’t it be prudent to maintain your license?  It would probably take some months before you could make up in service training and relicense.

As you explained the 120 hours of in service training was too much to include in your busy schedule and that your position doesn’t require to to have a CPA license.  Your are correct but these 120 hours only need to be completed over three years.  Is this really too much of a burden?  Besides I would fully support your attendance on City time and reimbursement for your expenses.

I realize in your emails to Larry Shook, questions re the RPS Settlement Agreement must now go to the City Attorney’s Office.  I just have a few quick questions regarding your CPA license. In the interest of transparency could you at least answer these questions:

You said you let your your license expire on 06-30-06.  Was it then that you advised the City Council and took steps to remove the usage of CPA in conjunction with your name?  Or was it later when Ms. McKereghan called this to the attention of Ms. Phister and Mr. Dalton.   And if so why did you wait so long?

Since the Treasury Department is under your direct supervision, the City’s Treasurer’s website had your name as chair of the City’s investment committee with CPA after your name?  How long has it been there?  Why wasn’t it removed after you let your license expire?  Did you order it’s removal last week?

Will the City Auditor’s position be filled anytime soon?  I see this as an important structural check against these less than ethical transactions.

At the recent Spokane Chapter Meeting of WSCPA where you were a speaker, could you please explain why CPA appeared after your name on the printed bulletin after your name?

Did you sign any documents, emails, correspondence et al with CPA after your name after your CPA license expired?

Again as Larry Shook, I sympathize with your position and your colleagues but had any of those with professional licenses acted based on their professional ethics and state and federal law, the RPS Bond Fraud, the subsequent fraud with the RPS Settlement Agreement and the death of Jo Savage would have never occurred and the citizens of Spokane would not be on the limb for $45M.


Yours,


Det. Ron Wright (Retired)

Professional Vitae

*****

Detective Wright:

Thank you for sharing this with me. It’s a valuable public record of a retired criminal investigator attempting to make sense of Spokane’s extraordinary public corruption. Whether this community can ever heal itself of its serious affliction will depend, I believe, on the involvement of its citizens. With this correspondence you have given the public an opportunity to help itself, if it wants to. If it chooses not to act, it cannot consider itself an innocent victim. At the very least, every recipient of this email can forward it to others to make them aware of your concerns about the evidence you cite.

Larry Shook

*****

Dear Mr. Wright,

Thank you for your email (below) forwarded to me this morning by Mr. Shook.   I am responding to you directly to avoid a repeat of individuals on Mr. Shook’s distribution list later questioning why I am sharing information with them unsolicited.

The answers to your various questions (see below) regarding my prior certification are generally contained in my February 5th email regarding the same.   However, in the interest of clarity, the following is provided:

I removed all known references to CPA at the time I lapsed my license, and I immediately alerted my staff.  Inasmuch as CPA’s not working for public accounting firms regularly lapse their licenses later in their careers, I did not deem alerts beyond my staff necessary.  Naturally, I responded to the recipients of Donna McKereghan’s email in response to the questions she had raised.

The reference on the Treasurer’s website was unknown to me until you alerted me (thank you!) and I therefore moved immediately to correct the error as per the following emails:

2/9/10

Gavin,

I’m sorry about the mistake.  I do remember you mentioning that you had not maintained your standing as a CPA.  However, I forgot to update the Treasurer’s website.

Thanks,

Ellen Dolan

Ellen Dolan, CFA

City Treasurer/Investment Officer



From: Cooley, Gavin
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 5:14 PM
To: Dolan, Ellen
Cc: Pfister, Terri; Cooley, Gavin; Williams, Laura; ‘investigations@cpaboard.wa.gov
Subject: Correction needed: remove “CPA” designation

Hi Ellen,

It has been brought to my attention that I am listed as a CPA on the City’s webpage for the Investment Committee.  Please note that  I have not maintained my standing as a CPA and since becoming inactive I have openly requested that the designation be removed from my business cards, letterhead and all other known displays.  Accordingly, please have the aforementioned CPA designation immediately removed from the City’s webpage.

Thank you,

Gavin

As for the Spokane Chapter Meeting at which I spoke last week, I was similarly was unaware I had been listed as a CPA.  I had previously sent a bio that did not list me as a CPA and I had not seen the brochure. Again, you alerted me and I immediately moved to correct the situation as per the following emails that were sent addressing the error:

I assume that Sue Megaard was unaware of that fact.  Thank you for clarifying.

The bio you submitted did not list you as a CPA.

Bob

>>> “Cooley, Gavin” <GCooley@SpokaneCity.org> 2/9/2010 9:26 AM >>>

Hi Bob,

It was brought to my attention yesterday that I was listed as a CPA on the brochure for tomorrow’s Clair Daniels Symposium.  In fact, my license has been inactive for several years so I will make a brief announcement at the front end of my comments tomorrow to assure we do not mislead anyone in attendance.  You may want to alert organizers of the event.

Thank you,

Gavin

 Regarding the City Auditor, the City Council, in conjunction with the Audit Committee, is solely responsible for that position.   As a practical matter, I strongly believe the position potentially adds tremendous value to the City organization and citizens.

The views of citizens are important and, clearly, you and others believe your City’s CFO should maintain his CPA certification.  In that regard, it really doesn’t matter that, in my opinion, my average day at the office contains more relevant education than the same number of hours in a CPE course.  Accordingly, I will give proper consideration to regaining my certification.

At the end of your email you state:

“Again as Larry Shook, I sympathize with your position and your colleagues but had any of those with professional licenses acted based on their professional ethics and state and federal law, the RPS Bond Fraud, the subsequent fraud with the RPS Settlement Agreement and the death of Jo Savage would have never occurred and the citizens of Spokane would not be on the limb for $45M.”

Everyone has opinions and you have a right to yours.  For my part, I know beyond the smallest doubt, that this assertion is untrue and fundamentally misguided.  I was there.  Despite the assertions of Mr. Shook and others, I rest very easy in my knowledge that I absolutely acted in accordance with the highest ethical standards and in the best interests of the Citizens of our community.

Thank you for providing information on your background and move to Spokane.  You are obviously passionate about the health and welfare of your adopted community and I respect that.

Sincerely,

Gavin Cooley

*****

Dear Mr. Cooley,

Thanks for your response to my questions.  I might add you should indeed meet for coffee with former Sheriff Bamonte.

I have only one follow up question with several parts.

You say you were unaware of the Treasurer’s webpage with the misleading reference to you having a CPA.  You said that when you were notified by me of this error you acted to immediately remove it.  This was an appropriate action to take.

My question is as follows.  You say I alerted you.  By this statement I’m assuming you did not receive notification by the WA State Board of Accountancy after my filing of my complaint on Monday, February 8, 2010.  Is this true?

I did not reveal my complaint to the City of Spokane until Tuesday, February 9, 2010, after I discovered in the afternoon this page had been “scubbed.”  It was at this time I wrote Mr. Danek and disclosed my substance of my complaint.  I did partially disclosed my actions to Ms. Pfister and Ms. Farnsworth on Monday because of my concern that City records were in danger of being destroyed and asked that they take appropriate measures to protect the records.  There was a cryptic reference by Mr. Adams in an S-R article thread by Mr. Brunt on the unfilled City Auditor position, however there was no mention of the substance of my complaint.

Could you please clarify again how you received notice of the error on the City’s webpage?  Did your notification come by way of Ms. Pfister or Ms. Farnsworth?

Again thank you for your kind reply.  Transparency in such matters in the City of Spokane in my opinion has been the direct cause of these financial disasters that must be now borne by the citizens of Spokane and the structural deficit the City is now facing.  And I also concur re the importance of filling the City Auditor position with all do haste.

Yours,

Det. Ron Wright (Retired)

UPDATE II:

Councilman Bob Apple responds to email by Dick Adams.  Followed by a comment from Larry Shook:

Investigations
State Board of Accountancy

You may find this email exchange of use in your investigation.  Councilman Bob Apple is a sitting City of Spokane Councilmember perhaps worth interviewing in the course of your investigation.  That is if you proceed beyond the simple misuse of the term CPA and seek to hold Cooley professional responsible for his previous actions that probably were the real reasons why he let his CPA license lapse.  If you do you may also wish to consider Steven Rector too.  Unfortunately the WSBA did not pursue aggressively the complaint in what Attorney Laurel Siddoway also did in representing the citizens of Spokane in the RPS Settlement Agreement.

Det. Ron Wright (Retired)


———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Larry Shook <lwshook@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 8:45 AM
Subject: Councilman Bob Apple on Spokane CFO Gavin Cooley
To: Larry Shook <lwshook@gmail.com>
Cc: “Cooley, Gavin” <GCooley@spokanecity.org>, “Verner, Mary” <MVerner@spokanecity.org>, CityCouncil@spokanecity.org

Dear All:

 

Retired U.S. Steel executive Dick Adams has been one of Spokane’s most tireless budget hawks for years. Mr. Adams is extremely critical of the role played by Spokane C.F.O. Gavin Cooley in the city’s budget crisis and the public corruption associated with it. He recently exchanged emails with Councilman Bob Apple on this subject. Councilman Apple’s response, below, suggests that he shares at least some of Mr. Adams’s views.

Allegations have been made for years about the pivotal role played by key Spokane public servants in what both retired Det. Ron Wright and retired Sheriff Tony Bamonte allege is the continuing organized criminal enterprise that victimizes Spokane. O. Yale Lewis, Spokane’s first special counsel concerning what emerged as the River Park Square federal securities fraud, immediately found evidence of this very pattern when he signaled in court filings that he intended to investigate whether there had been a “civil conspiracy to improperly divert public money for private purpose” between public officials and the RPS developer. We now know that Mr. Lewis never got a chance to pursue that evidence. We know that the developer mounted a secret campaign to remove Mr. Lewis’s client, former Mayor John Talbott from office. (Please see the article “How a publishing heiress went after an uncooperative mayor at http://www.camasmagazine.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?aid=181.) We also know that this publishing heiress’s newspaper, The Spokesman-Review, was used to commit actual malice against Mayor Talbott by twice branding him in print as a “civic terrorist.” (Please see the story, “All in the Family” aw www.camasmagazine.com.)  Mayor Talbott’s alleged act of terrorism was attempting to expose what the evidence shows was a $23 million federal fraud that served as the cornerstone of what the IRS suggested was the RPS fraud. (Please “Inside Job” and “The Casino was Rigged” at www.camasmagazine.com.)

What Councilman Apple below refers to as “dirt” is presumably the broad pattern of corruption that Det. Wright and Sheriff Bamonte say proves the existence of organized crime in Spokane. It is this organized crime, they say, that caused the death of Jo Ellen Savage in the RPS parking garage on 4/8/06. (Please see “Death by Parking” and “Deathtrap” at www.girlfromhotsprings.com.) Sheriff Bamonte alleges that Ms. Savage’s death was uncharged first-degree manslaughter. “That means Savage was murdered,” says  Bamonte,the retired sheriff credited in the book, Breaking Blue, for solving the oldest open murder case in U.S. history.   Presumably, the “dirt” referred to by Councilman Apple is the same evidence of corruption that, according to Spokesman-
Review
reporters, left a permanent stench, both in the paper’s newsroom and the Spokane community, because of the paper’s poor reporting of the RPS scandal and Spokane’s continuing toleration of the chronic public corruption that caused it. As the fourth anniversary of Ms. Savage’s death approaches, these facts, I believe, are worth remembering by everyone who longs to see Spokane become a health community.

 

Larry Shook

 

 



Subject: RE: PRESIDENTS DAY
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:16:38 -0800
Dick Adams:Taxes, such as property taxes that the voters have passed most often and at least had a say or well until last year when those outgoing hacks, jacked up those utilities.  It is frustrating when you want to encourage building that results in more jobs and revenue so that you will not have to directly pay an increase but right now the economy just isn’t working so, the new hacks want to increase taxes.  I’m also feeling that unreasonable large School Bond but the voters said OK and I’m happy the voters said the same for Streets and Parks but it is going to be tough this year with; EMS, Fire Bond and some Kids Initiative.  Honestly, I’m just happy the voters get to decide some because staff and council are looking at fees, fines and anything else that can be imposed by those you have chosen.As for Cooley well I’ve been expecting the last three Mayors to make a change however he has become to well aligned with the self professed power brokers and the dirt has been shared for his salvation.  Worse, he is only one of a wealth of the problems that have resulted in unbelievable pay increases for upper management and they all work hard only at covering the tracks but I still point occasionally such the Fire Chief receiving $225 Thousand annually now, in wages and benefits.  When I was in Olympia, visiting last month I was told we need to find more money for programs from republicans and try to hold the line from democrats so when I got done shaking my head I, was happy to get home.The fact is we are looking at a $10 Million shortfall and this Council cannot decide whether to accept $5 Million from Conservation Futures public funds already charged you or make the estimated shortfall $15 Million.  As you can guess I’m shaking my head here and know if we do not act now to curb the problem it will be unmanageable by August like it was the first year I was on the Council and well, they just won’t listen.  You see, I now know what you must understand and that is that they really do believe your pockets are endless, really unfortunate huh.Bob Apple

 


Read the rest of this entry »

January 4th, 2010

The Inlander also caves to ‘Spokane nice’ in covering up a homicide [Spokane, WA]

I just sent this email to Ted McGregor the publisher of The Inlander regarding the rather rosy eyed piece by Inlander reporters Smith and Deshais on the last decade in Spokane.  The problem is a woman died in the RPS Parking Garage that was the direct result of a $100M bond fraud that was consummated by the Cowles Media Empire.  This is a real page turning homicide mystery that no one wants to report.  Why?  And more interestingly this is a true story and not fiction!


*****

Dear Mr. McGregor,


I generally don’t expect much from The Inlander but do appreciate the stories that you break from time to time that the Cowles’ media won’t report in our little berg.  The Inlander did do some heavy hitting reporting on the RPS scandal at the time but abruptly stopped for some reason.  As I wrote you sometime ago I have a source who heard Cris Peck allegedly threatened you and The Inlander that if you didn’t stop with your reporting, the Cowles would pull their ad revenue and by inference the other advertisers in their sphere of influence.  They have done this before with other alternative papers by undercutting their ad rates and forced them to go out of business.  You have never responded to my request to confirm or deny this.  At the time I mentioned I have hard evidence that the Cowles did just this to KXLY while Tom Grant was doing his reporting there.  Herling confirmed they were losing $100K in ad revenue.


Sorry but I have to agree with Tim Connor’s critique of your story by Joel and Nick.  I posted several comments in the article thread to alert your readers to Tim’s piece and other alternative info re the Cowles Co has so far successfully covered up the manslaughter death of Jo Savage in the RPS Parking Garage.  The question is whether you will leave my comments.  The S-R has used the artful practice of self-censorship which it has a long M/O of doing with its own reporters in matters near or dear to the Cowles family by removing my civil comments to conceal this alternative info from its blog readers.  Why?   In a normal media environment this would be Page One above the fold material.  Why doesn’t it get covered here?


This story will eventually break and all the media that played along and compromised their journalistic responsibility/ethics/principles to their readers and viewers will look pretty lame as well as all who play “Spokane nice” in our town.


BTW you let Joe Shogun (AKA King Joe) off rather lightly in view of his summarily throwing folks out of Council Chambers during meetings.  When I was there on Dec 7, he threw two people out.  I was sitting in the audience near the front with Reporter Jonathan Brunt and I didn’t hear what was said to invoke the wrath of King Joe.

Yours,


Det. Ron Wright (Retired)

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: rocketsbrain <nar9350@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:32 AM


Subject: OK some counter-insurgency working re RPS:-) (Big Laugh!)

OK I know some folks have issues with Dave and why he continues to blog under the watchful eye of the S-R.  . . . Dave just posted this piece in his blog somewhat by my prodding.  Never forget that it’s the thousands of little pin pricks of the long tail of the Blogos that will cause the Cowles’ dike on the free flow of info in this berg to break:-)


Never forget…

Posted by Dave at 3:47 a.m. on January 4 Comments (0)


Good morning, Netizens…


After reading quite a few messages about the article that appears in the latest Inlander, which appears here http://www.inlander.com/content/newscommentary_decade_review_rps_sta_strong_mayor and a well-written rebuttal written by The Center For Justice’s Tim Connor which appears here: http://cforjustice.org/2010/01/01/01012010/ and after pulling and reviewing my own records about the early days of the River Park Square Parking Garage debacle, I have had to make some hard decisions yet once again. I state once again because this entire affair has been beating our consciousness for a considerable time, it has impacted a lot of innocent people, but regrettably, it isn’t over yet.


I know too many people who simply sold their homes and businesses and moved out of the area because of the politics of the time. I remember how the stench of corruption hung over City Hall once the facts surrounding the public-private partnership first became known.


The Inlander article by Joel Smith and Nicholas Deshais appears to have deliberately ignored anyone who holds a different opinion of the facts. No mention is made of the death of Jo Savage, save for the comments to the article by both Ron_the_Cop and the Center for Justice’s Tim Connor. In fact, I cannot recall reading anything in the Inlander that is negative in any way to the interests of Downtown Spokane. Do Smith and Deshais have the balls to quote the elegant former City Councilwoman Cherie Rogers on the “mystery financing” surrounding the parking garage, for example? That might ruin their thesis. I nearly spilled my coffee upon hearing that Jim Sheehan’s developments have any ties to River Park Square. Oh, yeah, sure.


However I think someone should award Joel Smith and Nicholas Deshais a set of matching pom poms and frilly cheerleader costumes so they can stand in front of River Park Square and properly serve up more plastic cups of boosterism that they seem to have uncapped in lieu of journalism.

Dave

January 2nd, 2010

Update – ‘Deathtrap in Spokane’ – Cowles Co. covers up manslaughter death of Jo Savage

I just updated my last post:

A New Year’s Day brick through The Inlander’s rose-coloured windows.

I thought this was worthy of its own post:

I’ve notice that there has been considerable interest in my professional opinion that the Cowles Co. as evidenced by its past criminal actions is a ongoing criminal enterprise as defined in the Federal Rico Act.  Both former Sheriff Tony Bamonte of Breaking Blue fame and I are extensively quoted in this excellent investigative piece by award winning investigative journalist Larry Shook:

‘Deathtrap’

Cowles media dynasty called hub of
organized crime by two former lawmen

Woman died, public threatened because of
government collusion with powerful family, they say  

I would encourage all to watch this short video produced by Larry Shook and decide whether the manslaughter death of Jo Savage is being covered up by the Cowles Co criminal enterprise:

January 2nd, 2010

A New Year’s Day brick through The Inlander’s rose-coloured windows.

Scroll for Updates:


HT Tim Connor – Center for Justice, Spokane, WA


And life continues on in Spokane, WA.  Spokane has many fine attributes which are why my wife and I chose to relocate here.   Unfortunately the political and governmental environment here leaves much to be desired.  The co-option and corruption in fact is the worst I’ve seen in my entire thirty-five career as a law enforcement criminal investigator.  This is a company town run by the Cowles Co which by its past criminal actions is a ongoing criminal enterprise as defined in the Federal Rico Act:

. . .This ongoing criminal enterprise has successfully robbed in broad daylight the public treasury.  Sheriff Bamonte and I believe that the evidence proves that Jo Savage died as the direct result of this public corruption that has its roots in this criminal enterprise.  Its ongoing criminal actions over time were the proximate cause of Jo Savage’s death during its commission of the RPS Bond Fraud, RPS Bailout and their subsequent cover-ups and its operation continues to put the public at risk. . .

The question still remains is the RPS Parking Garage safe for continued public occupancy? As quoted by Shook, the late Steve Rudd a highly respected construction fraud expert said, “This is the most dangerous public facility I have ever seen.” Do we know it is safe for our loved ones to use?  The City of Spokane has ignored Sheriff Bamonte’s and my demands for the immediate inspection of the RPS Parking Garage.

. . .This criminal enterprise has so thoroughly co-opted/corrupted the political/governmental structures in Spokane that they can no longer act to protect the citizens of Spokane from criminal victimization and from imminent public hazards. The citizens of Spokane and the family of Jo Savage have a fundamental right to ensure that justice is served when their political/ governmental law enforcement and decision making bodies can’t or won’t act because of their systemic co-option/ corruption.  In our legal system – NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW.
[Note:  This is a direct quote from my RICO complaint]
This is the great irony in this new article in Spokane's alternative newspaper The Inlander:

The Decade When Spokane Grew Up (Again)

Cleaning up the park in the ’70s was great, but Spokane finally became a real city in the 2000s Joel Smith, Nicholas Deshais

that Tim Connor of Spokane's Center for Justice is responding to with his article published on CFJ's webpage and linked to it on his facebook page.  I posted this comment on Tim's facebook page:
Ron T. Cop

Tim you didn't mention the crooks so far have successfully covered up the First Degree Manslaughter death of Jo Savage and County Prosecutor Steve Tucker is the prime suspect in this cover up.  As for the Inlander I have a source that says Chris Peck [Former Spokesman-Review owned by the Cowles Co] editor] threatened Inlander Pubisher McGregor his ad revenue would disappear if the continued hard hitting reporting on RPS. I have hard evidence that the Cowles Co did this to KXLY when Grant was reporting there. Laurel Siddoway is a common denominator here.

BTW are you going to do a MOBIUS Project wrap up story? Fortunately some sunlight on the players may have disrupted this potential run on the public's money again by Spokane's power elite.

I posted the piece above in the comment thread of the Inlander article as well as this one:

Manslaughter death of Jo Savage in the RPS Parking Garage

Folks are free to read my evidence and professional opinion re the death of Jo Savage being a First Degree Manslaughter under WA State Law and decide for themselves what the truth is. Further her death was covered up by the powers that be and we still don't know if the RPS Parking Garage is safe for continued public occupancy:

RPS fraud & new Idaho lawsuit & Cover up of manslaughter death of Jo Savage in RPS garage

Here's Tim Connor's article:

A New Year’s Day brick through The Inlander’s rose-coloured windows.

On my way through the Browne’s Addition Rosauers yesterday I picked up two bottles of champagne, a couple peppers, curry sauce, two bottles of tonic water and a free copy of The Inlander.

I should explain the champagne. I thought the 2000s were a miserable decade, and one that will likely be viewed by historians as a pivotal period in which America’s worst instincts devoured its best. Jaded though I am, I still have children to raise, I still have hope that someone will teach me canasta in time for my golden years. I take all reasonable steps, including champagne and medicinal quantities of Guinness, to not succumb to the inner Irish blues that pull at the corners of my smile.

But, apparently, I’m still not seeing all the sunshine in this gray sky, especially here, in Spokane. Here, according to The Inlander’s Joel Smith and Nicholas Deshais, Spokane “finally became a real city in the 2000s” thanks to River Park Square and the turn to the strong mayor system of government.

“This,” Smith/Deshais announce in the first graph of the paper’s 12/31/09  lead news story, “is the decade that did it.”

As to River Park Square in particular, Smith & Deshais think it’s well past time to accept all the expensively promoted economic benefits of the painfully subsidized mall, and slide a big granite slab over the well-documented corruption that was at the heart of the project.

Lots of people who are pleased as punch about RPS are quoted in the story, which advances the rather laughable proposition that even Jim Sheehan’s developments near Main and Division are at least an indirect consequence of River Park Square’s makeover.

Some sense of sobriety in assessing River Park Square’s economic effect would have been useful. In my accounting, the approximate $40 million Spokane will lose to pay off the securities fraud case doesn’t begin to reflect the true financial cost of RPS. . .


UPDATE I:

I've notice that there has been considerable interest in my professional opinion that the Cowles Co. as evidenced by its past criminal actions is a ongoing criminal enterprise as defined in the Federal Rico Act.  Both former Sheriff Tony Bamonte of Breaking Blue fame and I are extensively quoted in this excellent investigative piece by award winning investigative journalist Larry Shook:

‘Deathtrap’

Cowles media dynasty called hub of
organized crime by two former lawmen

Woman died, public threatened because of
government collusion with powerful family, they say  

I would encourage all to watch this short video produced by Larry Shook and decide whether the manslaughter death of Jo Savage is being covered up by the Cowles Co criminal enterprise:

 

December 31st, 2009

A Smoking Gun Dot In President’s Report On Flight 253 Intel Failures!

Houston we have a problem!

 

HT AJ Strata of the Strata-Sphere

 

A very good summary of what led up to the failed Christmas Day Massacre.  We got lucky that day.  These are the questions that need to be asked.  Will they be answered is another matter.  This was a failure in leadership from the top.

 

A Smoking Gun Dot In President’s Report On Flight 253 Intel Failures

 

Published by AJStrata at 10:31 am under All General Discussions, Bin Laden/GWOT, Flight 253 Attempted Bombing

 

 

Smoking Gun II Update At End!

Very Important Updates Below!

 

Today we are gaining more and more clarity on the missteps that led up to a Nigerian Jihadist, who was armed with a powerful and sophisticated stealth bomb and trained by al Qaeda in Yemen, coming seconds away from inflicting a Christmas Day Massacre on Flight 253 over Detroit. And two things are becoming quickly apparent.

 

First is the glaring fact that news media is clueless about how things like intelligence gathering and the federal bureaucracy work. The root cause of this ignorance is because news reporters are inexperienced and unskilled spectators trying to grasp and convey these complex issues and actions to the public – and they do a terrible job of it. It is also due to the fact many of them are very much emotionally tied to this President as doe-eyed supporters (which is why you need political diversity on stories – not just in news rooms – to generate fair and balanced reporting). Biased and naive reporting seems to be the rule of thumb on this event.

 

The second aspect of this fiasco coming into focus is how the Obama administration changed the tone and pace of the war on terror. Toning down the ‘war on terror’ to a criminal investigation of ‘man-made-disasters’ has major impacts on our defenses. It fundamentally changes to nature of ‘the system’ which Homeland Security Secretary Napolitano infamously claimed had ‘worked’. Maybe it ‘worked’ as designed in its newer, lower key form. But it did not work in protecting this nation from attack.  .  .

December 29th, 2009

Lying to ourselves – Blindness to Islam ties helps terrorists by Ralph Peters

SCROLL FOR UPDATES:


I just received this from a colleague.  It’s definitely worth a read.  Peters and I are viewing the same elephant and are describing it in similar terms.  You can see some of my similar thoughts in my recent piece:


Heaven help up if these folks are actually protecting us! The failed Detroit attack

Ron

[From the NY Post December 29, 2009]

Lying to ourselves

By RALPH PETERS

Last Updated: 9:40 AM, December 29, 2009

Posted: 12:45 AM, December 29, 2009

On Christmas Day, an Islamist fanatic tried to blow up an airplane whose passengers were mostly Christians. And we helped.

Our government gets no thanks for preventing a tragedy. Only the bomber’s ineptitude preserved the lives of nearly 300 innocents.

How did we help Umar Abdulmutallab, a wealthy Muslim university graduate who decided that Allah wanted him to slaughter Christians on their most joyous holiday?

By continuing to lie to ourselves. Although willing — at last — to briefly use the word “terror,” yesterday President Obama still refused to make a connection between the action, the date and Islam.

Was it just a ticketing accident that led to a bombing attempt on Christmas? Was it all about blackout dates and frequent-flyer miles?

It wasn’t. You know it. And I know it. But our government refuses to know it. Despite vast databases crammed with evidence, our leaders — of both parties — still refuse to connect Islamist terrorism with Islam.

Our insistence that “Islam’s a religion of peace” would have been cold comfort to the family members of those passengers had the bomb detonated as planned.

Abdulmutallab’s own father warned our diplomats that his son had been infected by Islamist extremism. Our diplomats did nothing. Why? Because (despite a series of embassy bombings) the State Department dreads linking terrorism to Islam.

Contrast our political correctness with Abdulmutallab’s choice of Christmas for his intended massacre. Our troops stand down on Muslim holidays. A captive terrorist merely has to claim that a soldier dog-eared a Koran, and it’s courts-martial all around.

We proclaim that the terrorists “don’t represent Islam.” OK, whom do they represent? The Franciscans? We don’t get to decide what’s Islam and what isn’t. Muslims do. And far too many of them approve of violent jihad.

It gets worse. Instead of focusing on the religious zeal and inspiration of our enemies and how such motivations change the game, our “terrorism experts” agonize over whether such beasts as Abdulmutallab or Maj. Hasan, the Fort Hood assassin for Allah, are really members of al Qaeda or not.

As a Sunday Post editorial pointed out, al Qaeda’s far more than a formal organization; it’s an idea, a cause. If a terrorist says he’s al Qaeda, he is, even if he doesn’t have a union card from Jihadi Local 632.

We’re dealing with a global Muslim movement, not a Masons’ lodge. . .

This isn’t a revolt of the wretched of the earth. These terrorists are the Muslim-fanatic versions of Bill Ayers and the Weathermen, pampered kids unhappy with the world. Al Qaeda’s big guns are re- belling against privilege. There’s a lot of Freud in this fundamentalism. . .

We’re not just fighting men but a plague of faith. Until Washington accepts that, we’ll continue to reap a low return on our investments of blood and treasure.

On Christmas Day, a Muslim fanatic attempted to butcher hundreds of Christians (dead Jews would’ve been a bonus). Our response? Have airport security analyze the contents of grandma’s mini-bottle of shampoo — we don’t want to “discriminate.”

With our lies, self-deception and self-flagellation, we’re terror’s little helpers.

Ralph Peters’ latest book is “The War After Armageddon.”

Read the full article here at the NY POST

UPDATE I:

Napolitano Must Go — Now

 

The DHS secretary, appointed as a political favor, is endangering lives with her after-the-fact policing approach. (Also read Roger L. Simon:Fire Janet Napolitano Now)

 

 

 

 

 

December 27th, 2009

Heaven help up if these folks are actually protecting us! The failed Detroit attack

SCROLL FOR UPDATES:

 

See Also:

Lying to ourselves – Blindness to Islam ties helps terrorists by Ralph Peters

A Smoking Gun Dot In President’s Report On Flight 253 Intel Failures!

 

 

 

 

[Edited slightly to correct several typos and formatting errors]

 

HT The New Editor


I haven’t posted much at FOF re the GWOT.  I wrote extensively about this topic over at Rocket’s Brain Trust.  If you’ve read my other posts on the failed Detroit attack, we need a major paradigm shift in our thinking and approach to the GWOT.  We need to get our heads in the game and eyes on the ball.  So far we’re fighting and defending against the last attack.  Our enemy is not completely stupid!  Whether this guy was a lone wolf or not, the bottom line is this ideology can radicalize even highly educated youth.  This guy was not your average disaffected goat herder as Mark Steyn correctly says in his usual pithy flare.


We’re up sh-t creek without a paddle if the mindset of the DHS follows the insight of of Secretary Napolitano.  The only reason this attack failed is “operator error.”  This guy didn’t get it right in igniting the explosives in his underwear ala Reid the shoe bomber. Fortunately the passengers didn’t give him a second chance.   Reid was not low hanging fruit either as he’s been portrayed by media accounts.  He was to light the fuse with a lighter.  Unfortunately after he was denied boarding on the previous day, he was let on the second day.  This time without his lighter.  No one told him the end of the fuse needed to be cut in a different manner so it could be lit with a match.


DHS Sec. Napolitano: “The System Worked” in Failed Bombing of Northwest Flight

http://www.theneweditor.com/index.php?/archives/10680-DHS-Sec.-Napolitano-The-System-Worked-in-Failed-Bombing-of-Northwest-Flight.html


UPDATE I:


HT Hot Air

Poll: “The system worked”? Update: Rep. King votes … no

posted at 12:17 pm on December 27, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

Let’s see how many Hot Air readers agree with this statement by Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano this morning.  Under tough questioning by CNN’s Candy Crowley, Napolitano insisted that the failure of the bomb to explode showed that “the system worked” (click the image to watch):

HT Michelle Malkin

Clown alert: Janet Napolitano says the “system worked”

By Michelle Malkin  •  December 27, 2009 01:31 PM


UPDATE II:


HT Michelle Malkin

Breaking: Second Nigerian on Detroit-bound flight arrested; Update: “Stomach problems”

By Michelle Malkin  •  December 27, 2009 02:40 PM


Jihadists never rest.


And their m.o. has always been: Try, try again.

Hello:


UPDATE III:

Good summary of the Detroit attack by the foreign press:


Analysis: Detroit terror attack is a major intelligence and security failure


Mark Steyn commented on the significance of this attack at NRO’s “The Corner” (See Instapudit’s link below).  There is a message to all of us in law enforcement in satirist Steyn’s message.   You can’t win a war by playing defense.  You must play offense. You must know who the enemy is and the ideology that drives it.  The Israelis learned this a long time ago.  We are consuming scarce resources at great expense for a “feel good” sense of security that does little to provide actual security.


I’ve written about this before several years ago.  Perhaps it’s time to dust this off and have these discussions again within the law enforcement community.  To successfully defend this Country from those at war with us, we must  force leverage our scarce police resources in the homeland.  We must use the public as our eyes and ears.  The 600K or so police officers/agents at the local, regional, state and federal level in this Country can’t possibly be everywhere at once.  As I said to a fellow colleague of the Police Futurist International in a post to its egroup of the need to include the American public in the GWOT or whatever one wants to call it now:

Agreed when an attack is in progress [Citizens actively thwarting an attack in progress].  My point is we need a paradigm shift from one of first responders and reactionary responses to one of prevention.  We’ve already lost once an attack is in progress.  Our mission should be to prevent, deflect or disrupt an attack before it becomes operational.  Jihadist terror cells stick out like sore thumbs in our culture before they become operational.  They are very visible to the public if the public is informed what to look for.  With the public acting as our eyes and ears, we can disrupts these cells.  Even if we can’t prosecute because of sources and methods[*], it’s a win when an attack is thwarted.


[*] [This is the wall between domestic law enforcement agencies and the intelligence community.  If information/intelligence is obtained in a manner that would preclude its introduction at trial e.g., the failure to advise of Miranda or monitoring of enemy communications, that is acted upon that results in the arrests of others unless other independent and untainted evidence exists, no criminal prosecution is possible.  This is the doctrine of the “fruits of the poison tree” or the Exclusionary Rule.

Read the two links in this last line of Instapundit’s (Prof Glenn Reynold) link to Steyn’s post at NRO’s “The Corner” regarding the use of the new/alternative/social media to provide a framework where the public can assist in protecting against terror attacks [See my concept of Mission Focused Strategic Communications below]:

Somebody should write something on this phenomenon. Maybe even, you know, a book!

MARK STEYN: On September 11th 2001, the government’s (1970s) security procedures all failed, and …

On September 11th 2001, the government’s (1970s) security procedures all failed, and the only good news of the day came from self-reliant citizens (on Flight 93) using their own wits and a willingness to act.

On December 25th 2009, the government’s (post-9/11) security procedures all failed, and the only good news came once again from alert individuals.

As I wrote before, “The Traditional Law Enforcement/Criminal Justice System Paradigm is Ill Prepared to Fight this War on Terror –  What should Our Domestic Rules of Engagement be?

 

AQ struck in a deliberate, unprovoked, pre-mediated attack to kill as many people as possible. This was an act of war. This is a war we cannot lose against a nontraditional enemy, which is stateless, and wears no distinctive military markings. This enemy seeks the violent overthrow of our government. These are not normal times. Once this is understood, then appropriate rules of engagement can be formulated while still protecting individual citizens’ rights. [I’m] . . . not advocating abridging fundamental Constitutional rights of U.S. citizens. Reasonable investigators, making reasonable decisions given these special times, must be free to act without fear of second-guessing and repercussions. Such questioning inhibits decisive action to engage the enemy. A good read on this is an essay, “History’s Verdict,” by Victor Davis Hanson comparing the WWII military campaigns such as D-Day and with our expectation of perfection in this war. We must stay focused, our minds in the game, our eyes on the ball, and ignore the cries of foul from the bleachers. If we put our creative minds together we can definitely play the game smarter, out thinking and outmaneuvering the enemy in imaginative, creative, and innovative ways.


Once the ends of this Islamofascist enemy are understood, I’m sure our courts will give law enforcement considerable flexibility and latitude. This Country is as war. A clear and present danger can be demonstrated to invoke the exigent circumstances exception to the Fourth Amendment prohibition against search and seizure without warrant. It’s no big secret that al Qaeda has gone high tech and taken this war into cyberspace. AQ is now using cyberspace for command and control, propaganda, and recruiting purposes. . .


. . . Our enemy is exploiting our tolerance and respect for individual rights, religious freedom, and other cultures. This is the classical ethical dilemma, of the relativistic good of the many vs. the good of the few. Collectively we must defend our Country against this foreign enemy that has infiltrated our society while at the same time striking a fair balance to protect the individual rights of the few. Given our Country must survive to protect the rights of the few, this in this unique circumstance . . .

 

I don’t for a minute believe our founding fathers intended to extend the constitutional rights of U.S. citizens to a hostile embedded enemy, which seeks the violent overthrow of the government. The preservation of the Nation must come first. Collateral intrusions into the personal privacy of a few should not be a bar to actively pursing the enemy. Unrelated criminal activity inadvertently discovered while pursuing the enemy should continue receive the protection of the Exclusionary Rule.

 

Law enforcement’s mission must now be one of prevention e.g., to prevent, deflect, deter, and or to disrupt an attack.  The risk of allowing a successful attack to occur is far too great.  Our traditional role of investigation, arrest and prosecution of offenders is not effective in countering the attacks of our enemy at war with us. We’ve already lost if an enemy attack is successful besides who is there left to prosecute afterwards? We must “go for the ball” to prevent the enemy from launching an attack.  The legal issues and whether a successful prosecution is possible can be dealt with later. 


I’m not advocating the abridgment of our fundamental rights as citizens but I think it’s perverse to afford those rights to foreign nationals or those citizens that have become radicalized.  Neither I’m advocating “water boarding” or other extreme measures.  I would argue the doctrine of “exigent circumstances”  applies in these instances e.g., the classic case of a bomb about to be detonated or a kidnapping.  Our enemy has demonstrated on multiple occasions the will and ability to inflict mass civilian casualties.  Law enforcement should not be punished when acting in good faith when pursuing active terror attacks on the homeland. For example in this latest thwarted attack based on my training and experience there could have been other terrorists on inbound flights to the US.  I would have sought information and intelligence from this suspect without first advising him of Miranda.  The WSJ agrees with my assessment in this OP/ED.  Unrelated criminal activities inadvertently discovered while pursuing the enemy should continue receive the protection of the Exclusionary Rule. If this precludes a successful criminal prosecution so be it.  I have no issues with detaining such foreign nationals as enemy combatants for the duration of this war based on probable cause findings in special military tribunals or courts.  The thought of trying Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in a civilian criminal court in New York City is beyond the pale.  This will become a worldwide propaganda event for the enemy-  let alone a significant security risk to the citizens of New York.

 

Here’s some of my previous thoughts on using the American public via the Blogosphere to force leverage scarce police resources:


Mission Focused Strategic Communication:

These new communications mediums [The Internet, the new/alternative/social media and the Blogosphere] are all key to a concept I’ve coined, Mission Focused Strategic Communication.

Simply stated this is keeping communications as horizontal as possible using the least common denominators. Keep the links short between those having the info and those who can act. A classic failure example of this is the 9/11. FBI field agents figured it out but the risk adverse hierarchical decision-making pyramids of the entrenched intel bureaucracy prevented timely action. The “new media” can be harnessed to force leverage scarce police resources by enabling citizen participation at very little cost. The concept is “spontaneous order.” This occurred at the World Trade Center and also in Katrina where people came together in an ad hoc manner, assessed the situation, and took independent action on their own ignoring official sources of information. In the end they were able to save themselves. Had they followed “official” sources of info they would have died. On the practical side for local law enforcement, blogs are an ideal tool for quick two-way communications between neighborhood watches, the local patrol officers, and detectives bypassing the traditional means of communications. Envision a supercharged virtual neighborhood and business watches without all the face-to-face meetings where old info is dispensed.

 

**

Serial Murder Joseph Duncan & using the Blogos to force leverage scarce police resources

**

“Crowd sourcing” to police the financial markets

**

The Traditional Law Enforcement/Criminal Justice System Paradigm Is Ill Prepared to Fight this War On Terror – What Should Our Domestic Rules of Engagement be?

**

THE EVENT CLOCK IS TICKING . . .

Al-Qaeda seen planning for ’spectacular’ attack

**

POLICE CHIEFS: HOMELAND SECURITY STRATEGY FUNDAMENTALLY FLAWED
IACP Urges Focus On Prevention

 
UPDATE IV:


More thoughts from around the Blogos:


HT Roger Simon:

Delta Airlines Terror: Fire Janet Napolitano Now


If the election were being held today in the light of the terrorism on the Delta flight from Amsterdam, I have little doubt that John McCain – whatever his deficiencies as a candidate – would have been elected president, possibly in a landslide. Who would want Barack Obama now – or his bizarre collection of czars and advisers, including Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano?


Hours after the near disaster on the Delta flight, up popped the very Napolitano with the following statement: “I am grateful to the passengers and crew aboard Northwest Flight 253 who reacted quickly and heroically to an incident that could have had tragic results.”


Well, thanks a bunch, Janet. They certainly were heroic. But why did they even have to do it in the first place? What was Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab doing on that plane anyway when he was already apparently on the terror watch list and his own father had given warnings to the US Embassy of his son’s religious extremism only a month before? Any comment about that?

*****

HT Megan McArdel – The Atlantic

TSA Fails to Intercept Terrorist; We Pay the Price

28 Dec 2009 09:49 am

 

I don’t know what annoys me more:  Janet Napolitano saying “the system worked” when what she means is “the system failed, but smart passengers proved that the system is unnecessary”, or the moronic new rules the TSA is apparently putting into place in order to “prevent” future such occurances.  The TSA’s obsession with fighting the last war is so strong that I expect any day to see them building wooden forts at our nation’s airports in order to keep the redcoats at bay.  Every time they miss something, we have to give up more liberty.  .  .


UPDATE V:


I posted this summary of some of the thoughts here and some new material to the Police Futurist Int’l email group: 


I  was talking with a fellow Cassandra at Starbucks this morning who help me clarify my thinking.  He’s probably a little left of center.   He doesn’t believe “The One” would deliberately put the Country at risk.  With “The One’s” advisers e.g., Napolitano, I would  differ as this is all about style rather than substance.  I don’t think this is intentional but one from lack of experience and naivety in the real world and from a frame of reference re the threat we are now facing e.g, Neville Chamberlain.  Obama is still in campaign mode and so far hasn’t made the transition to one of being a leader that must make hard decisions quickly without the aid of focus groups to consider the political consequences.  My friend has issues with Bush/Cheney’s view of Islamofascist terrorism as acts of war e.g., a traditional war with a nation/state of the past.  He’s right to a point re our over use of the term “War” for other things like the War on Poverty, War on Drugs, War on Crime et al.  This presupposes that these wars are winnable.  Further it gives a false sense of expectation that our government will eventually win.  When the government comes up short it creates discontentment.


My friend and I are looking at the same elephant.  The real issue is how do we address this unique problem which in essence is a clash of cultures/ideologies – one that is modern (free will of men and equality of men and women) vs. one from Medieval times where man is inherently evil, women are chattel, and behavior must be controlled by Immans who interpret the will of G-d here on earth.  We are at war with a transnational, asymmetrical enemy that is driven by a radical ideology that seeks our total destruction that is fueled by our dependence on oil and the great wealth that flows from it.  Before the age of dependence on oil these ideologies did not pose a threat to our homeland.  These countries are feudal in nature and do not share this great wealth with their people.  In fact they keep them in check by this ideology and can divert the civilian anger conveniently to the Great and Little Satan as the root of all Evil.  We have had our own religious/political driven radical sects/cults from time to time e.g., the Inquisition, the Holocaust, David Korisch and Jim Jones.  David Korish and Jim Jones were recognize for what they were and were not funded by oil.  BTW the Sauds are not our friends in this war that have brokered a deal with the Devil e.g., the hard line Wahhabi’s to fund their radical mosque and madrases to remain in power.   Neither is the Iranian Regime which spends a great deal of its wealth pursuing a nuclear weapon and funding terrorist groups of both sides of the schism of Islam – Shi’ia and Sunni, to destabilize Lebanon and Israel.  Notwithstanding the people of Iran notwithstanding that have been subjugated by a radical minority of Shi’ia sect of Islam.


Do read Geert Wilders’ message to the American people:

America as the last man standing

I’m tend to see the current world from the frame of reference as does Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu does as reliving history circa 1938.  There can be no appeasement of Evil e.g, Adolf Hitler and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

What is the solution?  Weapons of mass destruction can now be launched by a group a few individuals that have the capacity to cause mass casualties.  As I’ve written before the name of the game is prevention.  We can’t allow an attack to occur.  The concept of “first responders” is a misnomer.  We’ve lost the game if an attack is successful.  As I wrote in the above post:

I’ve written about this before several years ago.  Perhaps it’s time to dust this off and have these discussions again within the law enforcement community.  To successfully defend this Country from those at war with us, we must  force leverage our scarce police resources in the homeland.  We must use the public as our eyes and ears.  The 600K or so police officers/agents at the local, regional, state and federal level in this Country can’t possibly be everywhere at once.  As I said to a fellow colleague of the Police Futurist International in a post to its egroup of the need to include the American public in the GWOT or whatever one wants to call it now:

Agreed when an attack is in progress [Citizens actively thwarting an attack in progress].  My point is we need a paradigm shift from one of first responders and reactionary responses to one of prevention.  We’ve already lost once an attack is in progress.  Our mission should be to prevent, deflect or disrupt an attack before it becomes operational.  Jihadist terror cells stick out like sore thumbs in our culture before they become operational.  They are very visible to the public if the public is informed what to look for.  With the public acting as our eyes and ears, we can disrupts these cells.  Even if we can’t prosecute because of sources and methods[*], it’s a win when an attack is thwarted.


[*] [This is the wall between domestic law enforcement agencies and the intelligence community.  If information/intelligence is obtained in a manner that would preclude its introduction at trial e.g., the failure to advise of Miranda or monitoring of enemy communications, that is acted upon that results in the arrests of others unless other independent and untainted evidence exists, no criminal prosecution is possible.  This is the doctrine of the “fruits of the poison tree” or the Exclusionary Rule.]

Law enforcement’s mission must now be one of prevention e.g., to prevent, deflect, deter, and or to disrupt an attack.  The risk of allowing a successful attack to occur is far too great.  Our traditional role of investigation, arrest and prosecution of offenders is not effective in countering the attacks of our enemy at war with us. We’ve already lost if an enemy attack is successful besides who is there left to prosecute afterwards? We must “go for the ball” to prevent the enemy from launching an attack in the first place.  The legal issues and whether a successful prosecution is possible can be dealt with later. 


I’m not advocating the abridgment of our fundamental rights as citizens but I think it’s perverse to afford those rights to foreign nationals or those citizens that have become radicalized.  Neither I’m advocating “water boarding” or other extreme measures.  I would argue the doctrine of “exigent circumstances”  applies in these instances e.g., the classic case of a bomb about to be detonated or a kidnapping.  Our enemy has demonstrated on multiple occasions the will and ability to inflict mass civilian casualties.  Law enforcement should not be punished when acting in good faith when pursuing active terror attacks on the homeland. For example in this latest thwarted attack based on my training and experience there could have been other terrorists on inbound flights to the US.  I would have sought information and intelligence from this suspect without first advising him of Miranda.  Denying the interception of enemy signal/communications is also perverse. 

 

If we had not cracked the the German and Japanese codes, the outcome of WWII could have gone the other way.The WSJ agrees with my assessment in this OP/ED.  Unrelated criminal activities inadvertently discovered while pursuing the enemy should continue receive the protection of the Exclusionary Rule. If this precludes a successful criminal prosecution so be it.  I have no issues with detaining such foreign nationals as enemy combatants for the duration of this war based on probable cause findings in special military tribunals or courts.  The thought of trying Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in a civilian criminal court in New York City is beyond the pale.  This will become a worldwide propaganda event for the enemy-  let alone a significant security risk to the citizens of New York.

 

As I wrote before, “The Traditional Law Enforcement/Criminal Justice System Paradigm is Ill Prepared to Fight this War on Terror –  What should Our Domestic Rules of Engagement be?

AQ struck in a deliberate, unprovoked, pre-mediated attack to kill as many people as possible. This was an act of war. This is a war we cannot lose against a nontraditional enemy, which is stateless, and wears no distinctive military markings. This enemy seeks the violent overthrow of our government. These are not normal times. Once this is understood, then appropriate rules of engagement can be formulated while still protecting individual citizens’ rights. [I’m] . . . not advocating abridging fundamental Constitutional rights of U.S. citizens. Reasonable investigators, making reasonable decisions given these special times, must be free to act without fear of second-guessing and repercussions. Such questioning inhibits decisive action to engage the enemy. A good read on this is an essay, “History’s Verdict,” by Victor Davis Hanson comparing the WWII military campaigns such as D-Day and with our expectation of perfection in this war. We must stay focused, our minds in the game, our eyes on the ball, and ignore the cries of foul from the bleachers. If we put our creative minds together we can definitely play the game smarter, out thinking and outmaneuvering the enemy in imaginative, creative, and innovative ways.


Once the ends of this Islamofascist enemy are understood, I’m sure our courts will give law enforcement considerable flexibility and latitude. This Country is as war. A clear and present danger can be demonstrated to invoke the exigent circumstances exception to the Fourth Amendment prohibition against search and seizure without warrant. It’s no big secret that al Qaeda has gone high tech and taken this war into cyberspace. AQ is now using cyberspace for command and control, propaganda, and recruiting purposes. . .


. . . Our enemy is exploiting our tolerance and respect for individual rights, religious freedom, and other cultures. This is the classical ethical dilemma, of the relativistic good of the many vs. the good of the few. Collectively we must defend our Country against this foreign enemy that has infiltrated our society while at the same time striking a fair balance to protect the individual rights of the few. Given our Country must survive to protect the rights of the few, this in this unique circumstance . . .

 

I don’t for a minute believe our founding fathers intended to extend the constitutional rights of U.S. citizens to a hostile embedded enemy, which seeks the violent overthrow of the government. The preservation of the Nation must come first. Collateral intrusions into the personal privacy of a few should not be a bar to actively pursing the enemy. Unrelated criminal activity inadvertently discovered while pursuing the enemy should continue receive the protection of the Exclusionary Rule.


Perhaps we should be honest with the American people.  Yes this is a war but can we stay in a perpetual state of war?  Will there be an end?  The Modern World has been fighting this war of ideologies since the 8th/9th Century.  There will be successful attacks.  We can’t be 100% successful in preventing/diverting these attacks.  This ideology has many of the same elements/attributes of other failed ideologies that couldn’t distribute goods/services equitably to the people and became totalitarian in nature with regard to the universal truth of the free will of men and women e.g., Nazism, Communism, Fascism, Maoism, Feudalism et al.  This war will not be won in our lifetime.  This is perhaps the fault of the Bush/Cheney Administration.  While they said this war was going to be a long haul, they’re characterization was somewhat less and this is a source of discontentment.


We have never faced a similar threat to our very existence.  Our current legal system as I wrote before is ill prepared to deal with this threat.  We need to be realistic and analyze what is driving this threat. We must make the distinction between these attacks and traditional criminal events while at the same time protecting the fundamental Constitutional rights of our own citizens.  We must be able to call a “shovel a shovel” and act accordingly. Whether we continue to call this a war or not our rules of engagement must change.


In my minds eye I keep seeing Det. Rosewood in Beverly Hills Cop I in the climatic scene near end of the movie when the detectives are “storming” Victor Maitland’s mansion (bad guy) to rescue the heroine. Det. Rosewood is making a “tactical approach” to the rear with the others. After taking numerous volleys of automatic weapons fire,  Det. Rosewood stands up, completely exposing himself, and yells to the gunmen on the veranda, “Police – You’re all under arrest.” Of course this is followed by several more blasts of automatic weapons fire narrowly missing Det. Rosewood, who then dives back over a concrete railing. There are other similar parallels between the political correctness in this movie and our current situation. The time for political correctness has long since passed.

 

UPDATE VI:

Airline security idiocy of the day: Milblogger Michael Yon handcuffed, Joan Rivers blocked

By Michelle Malkin  •  January 5, 2010 12:38 PM


File under “Homeland Security is a Joke.”Milblogger/independent war correspondent extraordinaire Michael Yon reports that he was stopped at Sea-Tac airport and handcuffed by TSA agents:

 

 

December 23rd, 2009

Did Obama exempt Interpol from same legal constraints as American law-enforcement?

HT Media Mythbusters & HOT AIR

This has been bouncing around the Net today.  I’ve posted several comments at Police Futurist Intl of which I’m a member:

Here’s an interesting post that has nothing to do with either the pros or cons of this executive order but the MSM giving a pass to the Obama administration on this:

Not News: Obama EO Removes Restrictions on INTERPOL

Now here’s a valid question re exemption from FOIA requests:

Did Obama exempt Interpol from same legal constraints as American law-enforcement?

During his presidency, Ronald Reagan granted the global police agency Interpol the status of diplomatic personnel in order to engage more constructively on international law enforcement.  In Executive Order 12425, Reagan made two exceptions to that status.  The first had to do with taxation, but the second was to make sure that Interpol had the same accountability for its actions as American law enforcement — namely, they had to produce records when demanded by courts and could not have immunity for their actions.

Barack Obama unexpectedly revoked those exceptions in a change to EO 12425 last month, as Threats Watch reports:

UPDATE I:

This debate has continued on both at the Media Mythbusters and the Police Futurist Int’l egroups.  Here my two cents worth so far:

FYI I just posted these thoughts in the other thread.  I think we’re getting to the heart of this debate now.  It’s not the current state of Interpol but what could happen in the future if system checks are not in place to protect abuses of our own Constitutional rights.

Bud, Olli, and Sid

I think this is why in this Country law enforcement bodies are subject to the Exclusionary Rule evolved through the courts and FOIA demands.  This is a fundamental check on the over reach of power by law enforcement/executive branch of government violating Constitutional rights of citizens.  Case in point just review the current Climategate scandal and how otherwise generally good scientists have had their ethics co-opted and were stonewalling on FOIA requests to reveal their source data and code for others to review.  This is the same research that led up to COP15 where we were on the verge of making major changes in the world’s economy on now suspect research that was supposedly well settled.

My quip re the UN and like international bodies that seemed to be dominate/ co-opted by corrupt Third World countries is directly related to my concerns re granting immunity to any of these bodies whether as in Interpol’s case may not be a concern just yet.  A case in point is the UN’s Commission on Human Rights.  While well intentioned, this Commission has some perverse member countries that at times have chaired this Commission e.g., China, Zimbabwe, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Libya, Algeria, Syria, and of all places the Sudan.

I just have quirks about yielding sovereignty to these international bodies no matter how well intentioned they may be.

This might be a much ado about nothing but we should keep our eyes wide open.  The Obama Administration has acted with rank amateurism e.g., DHS Secretary Napolitano.   I just was an explanation to ensure they have considered all the ramification of this executive order are.

December 16th, 2009

Timmerman/Newsmax: White House Wants to Stall Iran Sanctions

OK what in the heck for?

The Iranian nutcase is proceeding at flank speed to develop nuclear weapons while we contemplate our navels. Netanyaho is right that today’s world is much like it was in 1938 with the rise of the Third Reich.  Even The One acknowledged this in his recent speech re that there is Evil in the world and sometimes war is necessary e.g., Hitler.  Why can’t he connect the dots now?  There is no easy political solution that will keep his poll ratings up.  We need clear and decisive leadership and not campaigning.   The dangers are too great.

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Kenneth Timmerman <timmerman.road@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 8:12 AM
Subject: Timmerman/Newsmax: White House Wants to Stall Iran Sanctions
To: KRT 4 – Bloggers <timmerman.road@verizon.net>

White House Wants to Stall Iran Sanctions
Wednesday, 16 Dec 2009 09:59 AM Article Font Size     
By: Kenneth R. Timmerman

Even before the House overwhelmingly passed long-stalled legislation Tuesday to impose sanctions on foreign suppliers of refined petroleum products to Iran, the Obama administration had asked the Senate to hold off on approving new sanctions on Iran until early next year.

Read the full story here:
http://newsmax.com/KenTimmerman/Iran-sanctions-Housevote/2009/12/16/id/343434


Kenneth R. Timmerman
Contributing editor: Newsmax.com
Tel: 301-946-2918
Reply to: timmerman.road@verizon.net
Archive: www.newsmax.com/timmerman/